Experience of implantation of flow-diverter in the acute period of aneurismatic intracranial hemorrhage

  • D.V. Shchehlov SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
  • O.A. Pastushyn SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-7088
  • O.E. Svyrydiuk SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
  • S.V. Konotopchik SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
  • A.V. Naida SO «Scientific-practical Center of endovascular neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
Keywords: stroke; cerebral angiography; aneurysm; flow-diverter stent; hemorrhage; neurosurgery.


In the period from 2013 to 2019 at the Scientific and Practical Center for Endovascular Neuroradiology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, implantation of flow-diverter in the acute period of aneurysmal intracranial hemorrhage was performed in six patients (4 (66.7 %) men and 2 (33.3 %) women. The average age was 50 years). Hemorrhage was diagnosed using multispiral computed tomography, aneurysm was verified using cerebral subtraction angiography according to Seldinger. In 3 cases the aneurysm was located on the internal carotid artery, in 2 cases – on V4-segment of the vertebral artery, in1 case – on A1-segment of the anterior cerebral artery. Five patients received a loading dose of double antiplatelet therapy before implantation of a flow-diverter (300 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg acetylsalicylic acid). One patient received dual antiplatelet therapy (75 mg clopidogrel and 75 mg acetylsalicylic acid) in five days before stent implantation. All patients after implantation of a flow-diverter received double antiplatelet therapy in a standard dose (75 mg clopidogrel and 75 mg acetylsalicylic acid). In five cases a FRED (Microvention - Terumo) flow-diverter was used and in one case – Pipeline (Medtronic). The diameter and length of the stent depended on the angioantomy of the aneurysm and the bearing artery. In two cases the implantation of a flow-diverter was accompanied by the implantation of micro coils into the cavity of the aneurysm, in four cases – as a single endovascular treatment technique. There were no complications in the early or late postoperative period. At the time of discharge on the Glasgow modified exit scale (GOSE) five patients had more than 5 points, one patient died (1 point) for reasons not related to the underlying disease. A control examination in the period from 6 to 12 month after implantation passed three patients, in all cases of aneurysm from the blood circulation is totally excluded.


Download data is not yet available.


Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:8-14. PMID:2045924

Madaelil TP, Moran CJ, Cross DT, Kansagra AP. Flow diversion in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2017; 38(3):590-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5030

Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267-74. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6. PMID:12414200

Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F et al.; ATENA Investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke. 2008;39:2497-504. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756. PMID:18617659

Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW et al. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device — a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology. 2012;265:893-901. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422. PMID:22996749

Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858-68. doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099. PMID:23418004

Di Maria F, Pistocchi S, Clarençon F et al. Flow diversion versus standard endovascular techniques for the treatment of unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2325-30. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4437. PMID:26797138

Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Starke RM et al. Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2013;44:2150-54. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785. PMID:23723311

Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D et al. International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:108-15. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111. PMID:25355814

Cagnazzo F, di Carlo DT, Cappucci M, Lefevre P-H, Costalat V, Perrini P. Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2018;39(9):1669-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5730

How to Cite
Shchehlov, D., Pastushyn, O., Svyrydiuk, O., Konotopchik, S., & Naida, A. (2020). Experience of implantation of flow-diverter in the acute period of aneurismatic intracranial hemorrhage. Ukrainian Interventional Neuroradiology and Surgery, 29(3), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2019-3(29)-54-62

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>