Number of passes in mechanical thrombectomy: where is your limit?

  • A. Filioglo Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-3141
  • J.E. Cohen Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • N. Simaan Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • A. Honig Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • R.R. Leker Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Keywords: stroke; thrombectomy; stentriever; outcome.

Abstract

Background and aims. Stent retriever based thrombectomy is the mainstay of treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. However, recanalization is sometimes not achieved even after multiple passes of the thrombectomy device. Whether revascularization becomes futile or harmful with an increasing number of passes as well as criteria for when to halt attempting recanalization remain unknown. The purpose of our work is to analyze literature data on this issue.
Materials and methods. We performed a short review of the literature and summarized evidence on the impact of repeated stentriever attempts on outcome.
Results. Despite some controversies, the published data indicate that up to 30 % of patients still reach favorable outcome even when ≥5 stentriever passes are performed. Probability of obtaining functional independence after multiple stentriever attempts is even higher in patients with lower baseline NIHSS score. Patients who achieve successful reperfusion after ≥5 passes have significantly higher rates of functional independence and significantly lower rates of hemorrhagic transformation compared with those who do not achieve reperfusion. Rate of target recanalization after ≥4 passes may reach 19 %. Number of passes alone is not an independent negative predictor of functional independence. The impact of multiple stentriever attempts on hemorrhagic transformation has not been well-established.
Conclusions. Target vessel recanalization is an essential goal of mechanical thrombectomy, which should be pursued despite the additional number of passes and procedural time required. Number of stentriver attempts is not a game- changing factor in the decision to abort the procedure for technical futility. Treatment decisions need to be individualized for each patient based on operator’s experience and preferences, patient and clot-specific characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-31. PMID: 26898852 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.

Kharouba R, Gavriliuc P, Yaghmour NE et al. Number of stentriever passes and outcome after thrombectomy in stroke. J Neuroradiol. 2019;46(5):327-30. PMID: 30981826 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.014.

Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I et al. First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke. 2018;49(3):660-6. PMID: 29459390 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020315.

Nikoubashman O, Dekeyzer S, Riabikin A et al. True first-pass effect. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2140-6. PMID: 31216965 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025148.

Angermaier A, Michel P, Khaw AV et al. Intravenous thrombolysis and passes of thrombectomy as predictors for endovascular revascularization in ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(10):2488-95. PMID: 27495833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.024.

Garcia-Tornel A, Requena M, Rubiera M et al. When to stop. Stroke. 2019; 50(7):1781-8. PMID: 31177974 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025088.

Baek JH, Kim BM, Heo JH et al. Number of stent retriever passes associated with futile recanalization in acute stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(9):2088-95.PMID: 30354993 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021320.

Seker F, Pfaff J, Wolf M et al. Correlation of thrombectomy maneuver count with recanalization success and clinical outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(7):1368-71. PMID: 28473346 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5212.

Filioglo A, Cohen JE, Honig A, et al. More than five stentriever passes: real benefit or futile recanalization. Neuroradiology. 2020; Oct;62(10):1335-1340. PMID: 32556423 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02469-x.

Tonetti DA, Desai SM, Casillo S et al. Successful reperfusion, rather than number of passes, predicts clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(6):548-51. PMID: 31676689 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015330.

Jindal G, Carvalho HP, Wessell A et al. Beyond the first pass: revascularization remains critical in stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(11):1095-9. PMID: 31048458 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014773.

Bourcier R, Saleme S, Labreuche J, MazighiM, Fahed R, Blanc R, Gory B, Kyheng M, Marnat G, Bracard S, Desal H, Consoli A, Piotin M, Lapergue B, ASTER Trial Investigators. More than three passes of stent retriever is an independent predictor of parenchymal hematoma in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(7):625-9. PMID: 30389897 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014380.

Hassan AE, Kotta H, Shariff U et al. There is no association between the number of stent retriever passes and the incidence of hemorrhagic transformation for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:818. PMID: 31440198 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00818.

Published
2020-12-31
How to Cite
Filioglo, A., Cohen, J., Simaan, N., Honig, A., & Leker, R. (2020). Number of passes in mechanical thrombectomy: where is your limit?. Endovascular Neuroradiology, 33(3), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2020-3(33)-78-82