Analysis of the experience of anesthetic management during endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic cerebral stroke

  • N.B. Chabanovych SO «Scientific-Practical Center of Endovascular Neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5113-5082
  • M.Yu. Mamonova Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv
  • S.V. Konotopchyk SO «Scientific-Practical Center of Endovascular Neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
  • D.V. Shchehlov SO «Scientific-Practical Center of Endovascular Neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
  • M.B. Vyval SO «Scientific-Practical Center of Endovascular Neuroradiology NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
Keywords: ischemic stroke; treatment; mechanical thrombectomy; anesthetic management; general anesthesia; sedation.

Abstract

Objective ‒ to analyze our own experience of anesthetic management during mechanical thrombectomy (MTE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large cerebral vessels occlusion.
Materials and methods. Treatment of patients with AIS caused by large cerebral vessels occlusion was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the European Stroke Organization (ESO). MTE was performed in 63 patients (23 women and 40 men aged 36 to 82 years, mean age ‒ 62.00 ± 16.31 years). The severity of neurological symptoms in the acute period of ischemic stroke was assessed over time using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The degree of disability due to stroke was assessed using a modified Rankine scale (mSR) before discharge and after 90 days. The results by mRS after 90 days were the most indicative. Early ischemic changes in the brain on computed tomograms were assessed using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS). To reduce the time «onset-to groin time» (puncture of the femoral artery), all patients were immediately sent to the operating room upon hospitalization after neuroimaging. For MTE in 50 (79 %) cases conscious sedation with local anesthesia (sibazon, fentanyl) was used, in 13 (21%) cases ‒ general anesthesia (propofol, fentanyl, atracurium besylate). Regardless of the anesthesia method, vital signs were monitored and postoperative complications were assessed. The assessment of other important indicators related to the expiration of anesthesia was carried out: the time «onset-the the groin time» the time «from groin – to recanalization», the level of saturation, the stability of mean arterial pressure, the use of vasopressors or labetolol, the number of postoperative complications (pneumonia, dislocation with decompression craniotomy, nausea, myocardial infarction).
Results. The algorithm for anesthetic management of the perioperative period included the anesthesia during MTE, postoperative anesthetic monitoring and correction of deviations over the next 72 hours. Mandatory components of anesthetic support of MTE were to maintain blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg. before reperfusion and FiO2 0.45‒0.5%. Anesthetic management also included infusion therapy, prevention of vomiting and regurgitation, and symptomatic therapy. Special attention was paid to the control of hemodynamics in the postoperative period. The results of treatment according to mRS after 90 days showed that more than half of the patients ‒ 32 (50.8%) after MTE were independent of outside help (0‒2 points), 24 (38.1 %) ‒ 3‒5 points, 6 points (mortality) ‒ 7 (11.1 %). After general anesthesia during MTE, 2 (15.4 %) deaths were registered, after MTE with conscious sedation using ‒ 5 (10.0%). There more patients with the vasopressors or labetalol using and the number of postoperative pneumonia were identified in the group with general anesthesia. For other indicators, there was no statistically significant difference in the results depending on the type of anesthesia. There was no statistically significant difference in the results in depending on anesthesia method.
Conclusions. The choice of the anesthesia method during MTE for large cerebral vessels should be individual. There was no statistically significant difference in the results in treatment of patients with AIS using MTE (in particular, in mortality), depending on the type of anesthetic management. It is also wasn’t found in the time «onset – to groin time» and the time «groin – to recanalization» with various methods of anesthesia. Indications of vital functions, saturation, mean arterial pressure in patients did not have a significant difference. Differences were revealed in terms of the vasopressors or labetolol using and the number of postoperative pneumonia, depending on the anesthesia type. The anesthesia team should be involved in patient management from the moment of hospitalization, regardless of the method of anesthesia. The results of AIS treatment depend on the initial NIHSS and ASPECTS scores, comorbidity, collateral development, perioperative complications, and the degree of reperfusion after surgery. Special attention should be paid to hemodynamics before and after reperfusion recovery after vessel recanalization, taking into account the degree of reperfusion. The influence of the type of anesthesia on the results of the treatment of AIS with the MTE using remains under the further discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hillmann S, Wiedmann S, Fraser A et al. Temporal changes in the quality of acute stroke care in five national audits across Europe. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:432497. PMID: 26783519 PMCID: PMC4689962 DOI: 10.1155/2015/432497

Lahr MM, Luijckx GJ, Vroomen PC et al. Proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis in a centra-lized versus a decentralized acute stroke care setting. Stroke. 2012; 43(5):1336-40. PMID: 22426467 DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.641795

Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A et al. on behalf of the Action Plan for Stroke in Europe Working Group. Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3(4):309-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987318808719

Vakkasov KM, Naumov DYu, Vodopyanova NI i dr. Mehanicheskaya trombektomiya pri ostrom ishemicheskom insulte: opyt odnogo centra. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistyh zabolevanij. 2019;8(4S):95-103. DOI 10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-4S-95-103 (in Russian)

Hindman BJ. Anesthetic management of emergency endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Part 1: patient characteristics, determinants of effectiveness, and effect of blood pressure on outcome. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2019;128(4):695-705. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004044

Dinsmore J, Elwishi M, Kailainathan P. Anaesthesia for endovascular thrombectomy. Open Archive. Published: September 03, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2018.07.001.

John N, Mitchell P, Dowling R, Yan B. Is general anaesthesia preferable to conscious sedation in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy? A review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(1):93-100. PMID: 22922866 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1084-y

Schönenberger S, Möhlenbruch M, Pfaff J et al. Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke Treatment (SIESTA): a randomized monocentric trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(6):969-78. PMID: 25864723 DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12488

Simonsen CZ, Yoo AJ, Sorensen LH et al. Effect of general anaesthesia and conscious sedation during endovascular therapy on infarct growth and clinical outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(4):470-7. PMID: 29340574 PMCID: PMC5885172 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4474

Chunguang R, Guangjun X, Yanchao L et al. Effect of conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia on outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Front. Neurol. 2020 Mar 24;11:170. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00170.

Marion JT, Seyedsaadat SM, Pasternak JJ et al. Association of local anesthesia versus conscious sedation with functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing embolectomy. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Aug;26(4):396-404. doi: 0.1177/1591019920923831. Epub 2020 May 6. PMID: 32375517

McMahon S, Stocker G, Bell K. Anaesthetic Management of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischaemic Stroke. ATOTW 404. 28 May, 2019:1-9.

Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864-70. doi:10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864

Cerejo R, Cheng-Ching E, Hui F et al. Treatment of patients with mild acute ischemic stroke and associated large vessel occlusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;30:60-4. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.029

Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Goyal M et al. and for the IMS3 Investigators. Alberta Stroke Program early computed tomography score to select patients for endovascular treatment: Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS)-III Trial. Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):444-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003580

Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J et al. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet. 2000;35(9216):1670-4. PMID: 10905241 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6

Puetz V, Sylaja PN, Coutts SB et al. Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images predicts functional outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2485-90.

Ahmed N, Audebert H, Turc G et al. Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11–13 November 2018. Eur. Stroke J. 2018;4(4):307-17. PMID: 31903429 PMCID: PMC6921948 DOI: 10.1177/2F2396987319863606

Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE et al. Ge-neral anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1601-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554.

Published
2020-12-31
How to Cite
Chabanovych, N., Mamonova, M., Konotopchyk, S., Shchehlov, D., & Vyval, M. (2020). Analysis of the experience of anesthetic management during endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic cerebral stroke. Endovascular Neuroradiology, 34(4), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2020-4(34)-70-81

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>